Display posts from previous
Sort by

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

33 by The Newport
UPTHEPORT wrote:The Church one of the richest organisation in the Country still runs heavily on volunteers

Can't see any issue to be fair
And one of the richest in the world.

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
$200 billion +
United States

2. Catholic Church
$130 billion +
Vatican

3. Church of England
$7.8 billion
United Kingdom

4. Opus Dei (part of the Catholic Church)
$2.8 billion
Italy

And why do you think they are so rich.

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

34 by bishbashbosh
Willthiswork wrote:
bishbashbosh wrote:Sensible solution incoming...

In Newport there are various work based learning providers (ITEC, ACT & Rathbone). These providers work with 16-18 years olds and aim to get them work experience and associated qualifications in a number of employment sectors (Retail, Hospitality, Hair & Beauty).

It may be an idea for the club (if they haven't already) to approach these provisions and offer the shop as retail experience - maybe as an added perk we can throw in some free tickets. The club do not pay anything as the 16-18 year olds are gaining £30-50 a week for being on the provision, paid by WAG.

For reference here is ITEC's website. http://www.itecskills.co.uk/about-us/what-we-do?lang=en
Great idea. Is the club shop a permanent thing? I thought it was only temporary. If it's not then it would not be productive to 'employ' these youth as they wouldn't be able to see their programme through.
The club shop being permanent or temporary is irrelevant.

Having worked with work based learning provisions, the participants can do a short term or long term placement, the employer can decide. Believe me, work based learning provisions are in desperate need for placements for their participants.

The employer must have business and liability insurance and generally be willing to mentor the young people. The main drawback here though (and I hate generalising) is that 16-18 year olds on these provisions may not be the most reliable.

Definitely worth a punt and fits in nicely with our county in the community initiatives.

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

35 by mad norm
The Newport wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:The Church one of the richest organisation in the Country still runs heavily on volunteers

Can't see any issue to be fair
And one of the richest in the world.

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
$200 billion +
United States

2. Catholic Church
$130 billion +
Vatican

3. Church of England
$7.8 billion
United Kingdom

4. Opus Dei (part of the Catholic Church)
$2.8 billion
Italy

And why do you think they are so rich.

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

36 by worksop amber
The Newport wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:The Church one of the richest organisation in the Country still runs heavily on volunteers

Can't see any issue to be fair
And one of the richest in the world.

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
$200 billion +
United States

2. Catholic Church
$130 billion +
Vatican

3. Church of England
$7.8 billion
United Kingdom

4. Opus Dei (part of the Catholic Church)
$2.8 billion
Italy

And why do you think they are so rich.
Because for thousands of years they have taken from the poor what they could ill afford to give to make themselves even richer the greedy bast#@ds

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

37 by The Newport
worksop amber wrote:
The Newport wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:The Church one of the richest organisation in the Country still runs heavily on volunteers

Can't see any issue to be fair
And one of the richest in the world.

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
$200 billion +
United States

2. Catholic Church
$130 billion +
Vatican

3. Church of England
$7.8 billion
United Kingdom

4. Opus Dei (part of the Catholic Church)
$2.8 billion
Italy

And why do you think they are so rich.
Because for thousands of years they have taken from the poor what they could ill afford to give to make themselves even richer the greedy bast#@ds
And you have evidence do you?

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

41 by The Newport
Stan A. Einstein wrote:
The Newport wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Yes, their assets are the proof - if any were needed!

And what about your Royal Family?

.
The head of the Church of England being?

Nothing wrong with Christianity, it's Christians I have a problem with.
The Church of England is made up so the royals could divorce.


The Supreme Head of the Church of England was a title created in 1531 for King Henry VIII of England, who was responsible for the foundation of the English Protestant church that broke away from the authority of the Roman Catholic Church after Pope Paul III excommunicated Henry in 1538 over his divorce from Catherine of Aragon. The Act of Supremacy of 1534 confirmed the King's status as having supremacy over the church and required the nobility to swear an oath recognising Henry's supremacy. By 1536, Henry had broken with Rome, seized the church's assets in England and declared the Church of England as the established church with himself as its head. Henry's daughter, Queen Mary I, a staunch Catholic, attempted to restore the English church's allegiance to the Pope and repealed the Act of Supremacy in 1555. Her half-sister, the Protestant Elizabeth I, took the throne in 1558 and the next year, Parliament passed the Act of Supremacy of 1559 that restored the original act. The new Oath of Supremacy that nobles were required to swear gave the Queen's title as Supreme Governor of the church rather than Supreme Head, to avoid the charge that the monarchy was claiming divinity or usurping Christ, whom the Bible explicitly identifies as Head of the Church.

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

42 by Corpaboy
And here we go again !!!!

Another thread concerning the running of our Club and now our Club Shop , and we're some how debating the ins n outs of the different religious followings across the World , and what they're worth in monetary terms !!!

If our new CEO has taken a look on here over the last few days , he must be thinking "What the HELL have I signed up for here ?"

Get a grip , people .... for the sake of sanity !

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

43 by The Newport
Corpaboy wrote:And here we go again !!!!

Another thread concerning the running of our Club and now our Club Shop , and we're some how debating the ins n outs of the different religious followings across the World , and what they're worth in monetary terms !!!

If our new CEO has taken a look on here over the last few days , he must be thinking "What the HELL have I signed up for here ?"

Get a grip , people .... for the sake of sanity !
You're not interested in history then?

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

44 by big baz
The Newport wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:The Church one of the richest organisation in the Country still runs heavily on volunteers

Can't see any issue to be fair
And one of the richest in the world.

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
$200 billion +
United States

2. Catholic Church
$130 billion +
Vatican

3. Church of England
$7.8 billion
United Kingdom

4. Opus Dei (part of the Catholic Church)
$2.8 billion
Italy

And why do you think they are so rich.
The catholics probably would have had a lot more had they not had to pay out millions upon millions for hiding child abuse.

Re: Ok now I AM angry.....

45 by big baz
The Newport wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Yes, their assets are the proof - if any were needed!

And what about your Royal Family?

And a number businesses which I would like to name. But I think you already know who I mean.

You’re royal family? Not British I take it? Judging by your posts I’d go southern Irish catholic who has moved to the uk
Post Reply

Return to “Newport County Football Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users