Re: Some alterations at number 10
2In fairness Starmer & Labour are not blameless either on the ‘it was a work thing’ excuses! (am no fan of Bozza mind you) – think the anger and ire should be at the original ‘rules’ and their application and the complete lack of political or media scrutiny of them (in summer 2020 - parks being closed, car parks of ‘beauty spots’ being closed, overzealous policing, etc. when even at that point we knew outdoor transmission was responsible for only a very small % of transmission overall and especially in summer [partly due to the way vapour from breath evaporates] even more ‘safe’) – initially good (on paper at least) policies/rules turned into bad ones by cack handed application (see more recent ‘fan ban’ in Wales – yes I did have to shoehorn that into this!)…that said the ‘optics’ of what Bozza and Starmer, etc. did look VERY bad
Re: Some alterations at number 10
3If you are referring to the photograph of Starmer through a window, it was taking in late April 2021 in the run up to the Hartlepool by-election.
The Johnson incidents that we know about so far took place late March to May 2020 when the Coronavirus Health Protection Regulations were far more stringent.
The Johnson incidents that we know about so far took place late March to May 2020 when the Coronavirus Health Protection Regulations were far more stringent.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users