Frank Nouble 3 wrote:lowandhard wrote:Frank Nouble 3 wrote:whoareya wrote:There's a fair few people on here that need to make an appointment with their doctor for some anti-depressants. I had a look in around page 4 and honestly thought we must be getting hammered. Hardly a murmur for the goal that put us 1-0 up.
Have a look back at the extent of negativity (not opinion, its pure negativity) then look at the score, thenlook at the league 2 table.
And then make that appointment.
You do not know the difference then between negativity and fact then.
Hopeless until they went down to 10 men then we cruised it.
FACT.
Got the result brilliant but if you want to report on the last 30 minutes fine.
A full Salford side would have been a different experience albeit Matty was missing.
Tend to agree, I can’t get too carried away because we were better when their team of reserves ( apparently many of whom hadn’t played together ) went down to 10 men. That doesn’t mean I’m not delighted to be in the hat and in my opinion does not score enough on the scale as to qualify for antidepressant therapy.
At least Whoareya mentions a "fair few people" in his comments but again see what Low and Hard states after my reply.
Lets have a sense of perspective please.
Banned?
If you look back through the posts around the first half, the people you have compared with have at least mitigated their comments with the hope of improvement, encouragement, or added a bit of dry humour to their comments.
The level of impatient, kneejerk negativity that you post on every game, if we are not smashing teams off the field from the first minute is disproportionate.
We are delivering results that, over 90 minutes, have got us to the top of the league and progressing on yet another cup run.
If you cant see that then there's no point in debating it.