Amberexile wrote:Stan A. Einstein wrote:
Paul,
The trust money goes to the club. How that money is spent, for example how much of that money is used to pay off monies lost at Employment Tribunals is a mystery. So don't get why you haven't gotten out.
Proof? For the final time the facts as I see them lead me to believe that the £5,000 came from the trust. I don't see who else it would have been. However I stated I could be wrong. If I had proof I would not say that I could be wrong. You really are a bore.
Because what you say is not true and although it has been explained to you at length before, still you persist with these falsehoods.Bizarre. The Trust have told us how the money is spent and what they say makes perfect sense being the most logical use for money donated to the club. It really does make you look silly when you persist with these fantasies and then base your argument on them.
So basically you just made it up in a vane attempt to bolster a pathetically weak argument. For all we know it could have been you who donated the money, can you prove that you didn't?[/qmoneya
No Paul, I state an opinion based on the knowledge that I have. An opinion by it's nature ceases to be an opinion when it is proved.
Absolutely you can hold the opinion that I may have donated the money. And if you are not happy to be corrected when I assure you that I did not then that's your problem.
So let me take you through my logic.
£5,000 is a very substantial sum of money. I think in unlikely, but far from impossible that it was donated by an individual.
If that assumption is correct, and as I say it may not be, then it was donated by an organization.
Now if that organization was a trading company I think it very unlikely that they would not want to advertise the fact.
So if it is an organization that has donated the money, the question then becomes, which organisation has £5,000, isn't a trading company, and would wish to give £5,000 to Newport County AFC?
Now I don't have a problem with stating that I am happy to be corrected if I am wrong. I don't have a problem with accepting that even without correction my view could be wrong.
So tell me Paul, why do you have such a problem with accepting that I might be right?