I'd have him in the team week in week out, people seem to have forgotten what a great impact he had at the end of last season and how well he played. Plus he's exactly the kind of player we should be developing.Bush wrote:More proof that a players stock is never higher than when he isn’t at the club anymore.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
17SJG99 wrote:I'd have him in the team week in week out, people seem to have forgotten what a great impact he had at the end of last season and how well he played. Plus he's exactly the kind of player we should be developing.Bush wrote:More proof that a players stock is never higher than when he isn’t at the club anymore.
he doesnt fit into MF's tactics or style of play
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
18What exactly are MF's tactics?neilcork68 wrote:SJG99 wrote:I'd have him in the team week in week out, people seem to have forgotten what a great impact he had at the end of last season and how well he played. Plus he's exactly the kind of player we should be developing.Bush wrote:More proof that a players stock is never higher than when he isn’t at the club anymore.
he doesnt fit into MF's tactics or style of play
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
21Give what a rest? I’ve never said anything untoward about Tom before. He probably needed a loan move, but to a division higher than Truro. As for Sheehan, MF appears to be nursing him in readiness for next season. No problem with that. As for Willmott, if he’s a favourite of MF as some appear to think, no problem, every manager has them. Or do you not grasp how a discussion page works?Ado wrote:Give it a rest. It's getting really boring now.Dogger wrote:Meh! Rightly or wrongly he will never get picked ahead of Willmott while MF is in charge. Sheehan is also better than the pair of them.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
23Which club(s) at National league level do you think would have been a better choice for Tom?Dogger wrote:Give what a rest? I’ve never said anything untoward about Tom before. He probably needed a loan move, but to a division higher than Truro. As for Sheehan, MF appears to be nursing him in readiness for next season. No problem with that. As for Willmott, if he’s a favourite of MF as some appear to think, no problem, every manager has them. Or do you not grasp how a discussion page works?Ado wrote:Give it a rest. It's getting really boring now.Dogger wrote:Meh! Rightly or wrongly he will never get picked ahead of Willmott while MF is in charge. Sheehan is also better than the pair of them.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
24Probably Maidenhead. Nicely in mid-table, not too far away. Woking or Torquay would also have been good choices had they not been struggling to stay up.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
25Tom's doing a good job at Truro, getting some regular match time and building his confidence as well as helping Truro towards a play-off place.
It would be good if some fans gave him a bit of credit.
It would be good if some fans gave him a bit of credit.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
27[/quote]mad norm wrote:What exactly are MF's tactics?neilcork68 wrote:
he doesnt fit into MF's tactics or style of play
Sanest comment for years mate, they certainly confuse the hell out of me!
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
28I believe MF sent Tom to the conference south to toughen him up a bit - some big, rough players in that league and the refs and linesmen let a lot go.
He'll certainly come back stronger if/when he survives the ordeal. It will be good for us because if he has a bad game when he comes back MF can always threaten that he'll send him back to the conference south if he doesn't start performing.
He'll certainly come back stronger if/when he survives the ordeal. It will be good for us because if he has a bad game when he comes back MF can always threaten that he'll send him back to the conference south if he doesn't start performing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baladabadi, Free beer, Kairdiff Exile, Lord Tredegar's Parrot, MisterB, OLDCROMWELLIAN, Risca_Exile