I'd have him in the team week in week out, people seem to have forgotten what a great impact he had at the end of last season and how well he played. Plus he's exactly the kind of player we should be developing.Bush wrote:More proof that a players stock is never higher than when he isn’t at the club anymore.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
17SJG99 wrote:I'd have him in the team week in week out, people seem to have forgotten what a great impact he had at the end of last season and how well he played. Plus he's exactly the kind of player we should be developing.Bush wrote:More proof that a players stock is never higher than when he isn’t at the club anymore.
he doesnt fit into MF's tactics or style of play
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
18What exactly are MF's tactics?neilcork68 wrote:SJG99 wrote:I'd have him in the team week in week out, people seem to have forgotten what a great impact he had at the end of last season and how well he played. Plus he's exactly the kind of player we should be developing.Bush wrote:More proof that a players stock is never higher than when he isn’t at the club anymore.
he doesnt fit into MF's tactics or style of play
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
21Give what a rest? I’ve never said anything untoward about Tom before. He probably needed a loan move, but to a division higher than Truro. As for Sheehan, MF appears to be nursing him in readiness for next season. No problem with that. As for Willmott, if he’s a favourite of MF as some appear to think, no problem, every manager has them. Or do you not grasp how a discussion page works?Ado wrote:Give it a rest. It's getting really boring now.Dogger wrote:Meh! Rightly or wrongly he will never get picked ahead of Willmott while MF is in charge. Sheehan is also better than the pair of them.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
23Which club(s) at National league level do you think would have been a better choice for Tom?Dogger wrote:Give what a rest? I’ve never said anything untoward about Tom before. He probably needed a loan move, but to a division higher than Truro. As for Sheehan, MF appears to be nursing him in readiness for next season. No problem with that. As for Willmott, if he’s a favourite of MF as some appear to think, no problem, every manager has them. Or do you not grasp how a discussion page works?Ado wrote:Give it a rest. It's getting really boring now.Dogger wrote:Meh! Rightly or wrongly he will never get picked ahead of Willmott while MF is in charge. Sheehan is also better than the pair of them.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
24Probably Maidenhead. Nicely in mid-table, not too far away. Woking or Torquay would also have been good choices had they not been struggling to stay up.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
25Tom's doing a good job at Truro, getting some regular match time and building his confidence as well as helping Truro towards a play-off place.
It would be good if some fans gave him a bit of credit.
It would be good if some fans gave him a bit of credit.
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
27[/quote]mad norm wrote:What exactly are MF's tactics?neilcork68 wrote:
he doesnt fit into MF's tactics or style of play
Sanest comment for years mate, they certainly confuse the hell out of me!
Re: Tom Owen-Evans
28I believe MF sent Tom to the conference south to toughen him up a bit - some big, rough players in that league and the refs and linesmen let a lot go.
He'll certainly come back stronger if/when he survives the ordeal. It will be good for us because if he has a bad game when he comes back MF can always threaten that he'll send him back to the conference south if he doesn't start performing.
He'll certainly come back stronger if/when he survives the ordeal. It will be good for us because if he has a bad game when he comes back MF can always threaten that he'll send him back to the conference south if he doesn't start performing.