It was definitely going wide from the highlights, should be an o.g.Amberexile wrote:Was it an own goal?
I see the creepy goal has been credited to Smith but at the time, I thought his shot was going wide before it hit White. Having just watched the highlights, I still think so.
Dodgy goals panel anyone?
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
137But none from the Mighty Crawley Town.....And who are your opponents in round four might I ask.....Oh wait a minuteYelwarc wrote:My eyes have seen the glory of the cups at White Hart Lane.Dogger wrote:You & many other plastics in Newport are the reason why I hope County not only beat Spurs but actually stuff them. If you're gonna support a PL team at least pick one that's that's won the title in the last 57 years!Yelwarc wrote:Come on you spurs.
Boring Tw-t.....
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
138ssip ffo morf dam mronYelwarc wrote:My eyes have seen the glory of the cups at White Hart Lane.Dogger wrote:You & many other plastics in Newport are the reason why I hope County not only beat Spurs but actually stuff them. If you're gonna support a PL team at least pick one that's that's won the title in the last 57 years!Yelwarc wrote:Come on you spurs.
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
139The Facebook feed now says it was Bennett trying to clear it, FWIW.[/quote]
Day was 100% to blame for the goal, Mickey then tried to clear it off the line but it looked over to me & I was right in line with it.[/quote]
From the highlights, Day came out too late, jumped too low to claim it as he was moving forward and not up, and the ball broke to a striker whose shot was going wide until it hit the first defender (Bennett?), with the second defender (Demetriou?) trying to clear it from off the line. So actually whilst Day made an error, if Bennett hadn't got in the way of the shot it would have gone safely wide. Not that he knew that in time to get out of the way, obviously.[/quote]
Day shit his pants that's all. You can point it this factor or that factor but at the end of the day if he didn't shit his pants when he realised that nutter upfront for them wasn't stopping we would not have conceded.
Day was 100% to blame for the goal, Mickey then tried to clear it off the line but it looked over to me & I was right in line with it.[/quote]
From the highlights, Day came out too late, jumped too low to claim it as he was moving forward and not up, and the ball broke to a striker whose shot was going wide until it hit the first defender (Bennett?), with the second defender (Demetriou?) trying to clear it from off the line. So actually whilst Day made an error, if Bennett hadn't got in the way of the shot it would have gone safely wide. Not that he knew that in time to get out of the way, obviously.[/quote]
Day shit his pants that's all. You can point it this factor or that factor but at the end of the day if he didn't shit his pants when he realised that nutter upfront for them wasn't stopping we would not have conceded.
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
140Day was 100% to blame for the goal, Mickey then tried to clear it off the line but it looked over to me & I was right in line with it.[/quote]Bush wrote:The Facebook feed now says it was Bennett trying to clear it, FWIW.
From the highlights, Day came out too late, jumped too low to claim it as he was moving forward and not up, and the ball broke to a striker whose shot was going wide until it hit the first defender (Bennett?), with the second defender (Demetriou?) trying to clear it from off the line. So actually whilst Day made an error, if Bennett hadn't got in the way of the shot it would have gone safely wide. Not that he knew that in time to get out of the way, obviously.[/quote]
Day shit his pants that's all. You can point it this factor or that factor but at the end of the day if he didn't shit his pants when he realised that nutter upfront for them wasn't stopping we would not have conceded.[/quote]
Well done Bush.
Lovely way with words again.
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
141To put the result into perspective, it was only Crawley's second defeat since the end of November. A potential "banana skin" which we successfully avoided.
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
142Watching Wasps v Ulster on the box (dont judge me) and the Ricoh's pitch is cutting up pretty bad. Looks almost as bad as Rodders did last year.
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
143Wow just seen the latest try there. Pretty bad. But there was some terrible pitches on show on the football league highlights last night. Including Bristol rivers and they don’t even play rugby on it anymore!Exile 1976 wrote:Watching Wasps v Ulster on the box (dont judge me) and the Ricoh's pitch is cutting up pretty bad. Looks almost as bad as Rodders did last year.
Re: GRANDSTAND: CRAWLEY
145Southampton's pitch doesn't look too good at ground level either, though fine from a distance.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amberexile, DT1892, owlsabout