George Street-Bridge wrote:Hence "may be".

Maybe not.

Jonesy3 had read Gavin's programme article and the following day when I read it I came to the same conclusion. Reading it with a discerning mind there was no other possible conclusion to come to.

But my difficulty is not with this. My difficulty is that Gavin had clearly told the Argus what was going on but didn't tell the supporter owners of the club. And for the life of me, other than the omerta that strangled debate at our club I can't think for the life of me why.

To be fair, he said exactly what was in the Argus on the club's Facebook Live broadcast at half time yesterday.

Stan, would you classify yourself as a supporter owner of the club?

excessbee wrote:Stan, would you classify yourself as a supporter owner of the club?

Yes. And no more or less important than anyone else. If we are to achieve that which we are capable of we need to be as one. Unfortunately I get the impression that the club only ever engage with the support base when they need money. And whilst finance is important there is so much more, or at least should be, than money

Jonesy3 wrote:To be fair, he said exactly what was in the Argus on the club's Facebook Live broadcast at half time yesterday.

Once you first of all and later me had worked it out for ourselves. It's not a big issue, I just don't get the secrecy.