Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

37
lowandhard wrote:Yes a lot of rain, and FGR abandoned and they’re on top of a hill! Downside today is rfc now playing subaqua rugby on it :roll:
Putting the emotional aspect of it historically being home to Newport RFC, it begs the question, How can they have the same rights as us as tenants when you consider what we bring to the table in comparison?

Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

38
Alan G Bryant wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Yes a lot of rain, and FGR abandoned and they’re on top of a hill! Downside today is rfc now playing subaqua rugby on it :roll:
Putting the emotional aspect of it historically being home to Newport RFC, it begs the question, How can they have the same rights as us as tenants when you consider what we bring to the table in comparison?
There are probably those with Dragons, WRU and/or NRFC alliances who may well say 'think yourself lucky we are allowing you( county) to play at out rugby ground.
Last edited by OLDCROMWELLIAN on December 16th, 2018, 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

40
Alan G Bryant wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Yes a lot of rain, and FGR abandoned and they’re on top of a hill! Downside today is rfc now playing subaqua rugby on it :roll:
Putting the emotional aspect of it historically being home to Newport RFC, it begs the question, How can they have the same rights as us as tenants when you consider what we bring to the table in comparison?
They don't have anything like the same rights as us. It really is a disgrace that NRFC, once one of the WORLD'S greatest clubs, are 3rd class citizens in their own home.

Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

41
Willthiswork wrote:
Alan G Bryant wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Yes a lot of rain, and FGR abandoned and they’re on top of a hill! Downside today is rfc now playing subaqua rugby on it :roll:
Putting the emotional aspect of it historically being home to Newport RFC, it begs the question, How can they have the same rights as us as tenants when you consider what we bring to the table in comparison?
They don't have anything like the same rights as us. It really is a disgrace that NRFC, once one of the WORLD'S greatest clubs, are 3rd class citizens in their own home.
Well said

Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

42
Willthiswork wrote:
Alan G Bryant wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Yes a lot of rain, and FGR abandoned and they’re on top of a hill! Downside today is rfc now playing subaqua rugby on it :roll:
Putting the emotional aspect of it historically being home to Newport RFC, it begs the question, How can they have the same rights as us as tenants when you consider what we bring to the table in comparison?
They don't have anything like the same rights as us. It really is a disgrace that NRFC, once one of the WORLD'S greatest clubs, are 3rd class citizens in their own home.

Like I say , putting emotion aside , it is not actually their own home anymore.

Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

43
Putting the emotional aspect of it historically being home to Newport RFC, it begs the question, How can they have the same rights as us as tenants when you consider what we bring to the table in comparison?[/quote]

They don't have anything like the same rights as us. It really is a disgrace that NRFC, once one of the WORLD'S greatest clubs, are 3rd class citizens in their own home.[/quote]


Like I say , putting emotion aside , it is not actually their own home anymore.[/quote]

....allowed to play at RP so long as a professional rugby club plays there. That was one of the conditions that was in the vote - no emotion just fact.

Re: GRANDSTAND: EXILES v MK DONS

45
Willthiswork wrote:
Fourthousand wrote: ....allowed to play at RP so long as a professional rugby club plays there. That was one of the conditions that was in the vote - no emotion just fact.
Was it professional rugby, the Dragons team or professional sport plays there? That could be a big point. What if NRFC went professional?
Professional Rugby.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users