Wilmott mom? Really?

Labadie, O'Brien, Butler or Demetriou for me.

Tight one but I'll plump for Demetriou.

Harps62 wrote:

SULLY34 wrote:Willmott or Amond first half. Willmott; Jackson or O'Brien second half. Harps I've got to go with Willmott !!!!!!!! Jackson's got to partner Amond from the start next week.

Sully
Think you are spot on Marlon & Padraig to start.
I would of said Robbie on the first half but IMO Labs was immense.
If Marlon had more game time I would of voted for him.

Would have

Ugo. wrote:

Harps62 wrote:

SULLY34 wrote:Willmott or Amond first half. Willmott; Jackson or O'Brien second half. Harps I've got to go with Willmott !!!!!!!! Jackson's got to partner Amond from the start next week.

Sully
Think you are spot on Marlon & Padraig to start.
I would of said Robbie on the first half but IMO Labs was immense.
If Marlon had more game time I would of voted for him.

Would have

Not sure what that is meant to say but will try again.

If Marlon had played throughout as near 90 minutes as possible I would of voted him MOM.
Is that a bit clearer now if that is what you are getting at?

Harps62 wrote: Not sure what that is meant to say but will try again.

If Marlon had played throughout as near 90 minutes as possible I would of voted him MOM.
Is that a bit clearer now if that is what you are getting at?

It's would have not would of

Ugo. wrote:

Harps62 wrote: Not sure what that is meant to say but will try again.

If Marlon had played throughout as near 90 minutes as possible I would of voted him MOM.
Is that a bit clearer now if that is what you are getting at?

It's would have not would of

I thought this was a football forum, not a literacy test.

SULLY34 wrote:

Ugo. wrote:

Harps62 wrote: Not sure what that is meant to say but will try again.

If Marlon had played throughout as near 90 minutes as possible I would of voted him MOM.
Is that a bit clearer now if that is what you are getting at?

It's would have not would of

I thought this was a football forum, not a literacy test.

Yep. Sorry

Ugo. wrote:

Harps62 wrote: Not sure what that is meant to say but will try again.

If Marlon had played throughout as near 90 minutes as possible I would of voted him MOM.
Is that a bit clearer now if that is what you are getting at?

It's would have not would of

I wont say "do one"
Maybe
"Just go away"

Apologies for going off thread by the way.

I know it's all about opinions but for the life of me I honestly just cannot understand how anyone could say Willmott was motm...
I voted Labs but I can understand those that may have voted for O'Brien, Demetriou, White or even Day....but Willmott?

Harps62 wrote:

Ugo. wrote:

Harps62 wrote: Not sure what that is meant to say but will try again.

If Marlon had played throughout as near 90 minutes as possible I would of voted him MOM.
Is that a bit clearer now if that is what you are getting at?

It's would have not would of

I wont say "do one"
Maybe
"Just go away"

I'm going.....

Exile 1976 wrote:I know it's all about opinions but for the life of me I honestly just cannot understand how anyone could say Willmott was motm...
I voted Labs but I can understand those that may have voted for O'Brien, Demetriou, White or even Day....but Willmott?

Seriously Exile.
I thought he was really good first half even tackling and heading, some good crosses also.
Second half he disappeared as told to drop back but a great improvement on recent performances from his last 3 away games anyway & Wembley.

Labs.

Exile 1976 wrote:I know it's all about opinions but for the life of me I honestly just cannot understand how anyone could say Willmott was motm...
I voted Labs but I can understand those that may have voted for O'Brien, Demetriou, White or even Day....but Willmott?

I'm not even a fan of Willmott but he was consistent throughout whereas others started poorly then finished the game better. Labadie wasn't at the high standards he has set recently and should've been sent off for the elbow. Stead was all over the back 3 in the first half and they only began to dominate in the 2nd half. So there's my reasoning.

Labadie

So far

Labs 7
O'Brien 4
Dan 1
Mickey 1
Robbie 1

Keep them coming

When finalised as requested will put the totals for everybody who has scored even if they cannot gain anymore points
Cheers
Harps

Harps62 wrote:So far

Labs 7
O'Brien 4
Dan 1
Mickey 1
Robbie 1

Keep them coming

When finalised as requested will put the totals for everybody who has scored even if they cannot gain anymore points
Cheers
Harps

I'm back

Mickey has got 2. Although one vote was spell checked to Mickey December